P&A Providers & Administrators
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Santander Settles CFPB Charges for $11.8M

Santander Consumer USA has agreed to pay $9.29 million in restitution and $2.5 million in fines to settle claims leveled by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau over the finance source’s GAP and interest-only payments programs.

Tariq Kamal
Tariq KamalFormer Associate Publisher
Read Tariq's Posts
November 21, 2018
Santander Settles CFPB Charges for $11.8M

Santander Consumer USA Inc. will pay $11.8 million to settle charges related to the sale of its S-GUARD GAP product and TRIPP interest-only payment plan.

Photo by Mike Mozart via Flickr

2 min to read


WASHINGTON — The federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced Santander Consumer USA Inc. will pay $11.8 million to settle charges the finance source misled car buyers who purchased Santander’s S-GUARD GAP product and opted into its Temporary Reduction in Payment Plan (TRIPP), which offered term-extending, interest-only payments and was marketed “aggressively,” according to a CFPB statement.

“Santander also failed to properly disclose the impact on consumers of obtaining a loan extension, including by not clearly and prominently disclosing that the additional interest accrued during the extension period would be paid before any payments to principal when the consumer resumed making payments,” according to the bureau’s consent order.

Ad Loading...

More than 10% of Santander-financed customers are said to have enrolled in TRIPP within a year of closing their deals; approximately 70% of the company’s 2.7 million U.S. customers belong to the subprime lending tier. The Dallas-based finance source was accused of failing to properly describe the terms of the program and how it would affect the total cost of each customer’s auto loan.

The settlement includes $9.29 million in restitution and $2.5 million in fines. In a statement released yesterday, Santander’s directors appeared ready to move forward; the company was not compelled to admit guilt to settle the charges.

“We are pleased to put this matter behind us,” the statement read, in part. “Strengthening compliance and consumer practices has been a key focus of ours.”

Topics:Compliance

Originally posted on F&I and Showroom

More Compliance

Photo of desk in sunny office
Complianceby Terry O'LoughlinFebruary 1, 2026

What to Expect in 2026 - New Rules and Regulations on the Horizon

In Trump’s first year, just 60,917 pages were printed in the Federal Register, the official journal of the federal government, down 42%.

Read More →
ComplianceNovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 15, 2025

Fines of the Times

Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Complianceby Hannah MitchellSeptember 5, 2025

Cyber Threats Continue Apace

Hackers, seeing auto retail vulnerabilities in 2024 CDK incident, are taking advantage, data show.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 11, 2025

Your Synthetic ID Theft Policy

Frankenstein’s monster is coming for your dealership. Use this guide to recognize synthetic ID thieves and maintain Red Flags Rule compliance.

Read More →
ComplianceJune 30, 2025

The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back

President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJune 26, 2025

How to Clear a Red Flag

Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.

Read More →
Computer screen showing the Audit F&I Review Dashboard, displaying dealership selection and manager scorecard options for ABC Dealership.
Complianceby Press ReleaseJune 18, 2025

Mosaic Adds Continuous Monitoring With AuditF&I

New AuditF&I platform is designed to give dealerships a smarter way to stay compliant.

Read More →
ComplianceJune 9, 2025

The Real ID Deadline

Challenges auto dealers may still face verifying identities

Read More →
Ad Loading...
IndustryMay 28, 2025

Mount Rushmore and Tariffs

A return to autarky? Are tariffs good policy?

Read More →